Mexico City /
Ernestina Godoylegal advisor to the Presidency of the Republic, described the court order addressed to the president as legally inadmissible and practically non-existent. Claudia Sheinbaum to remove from Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF) the reform of the Judicial Branch.
“It is an inadmissible resolution, legally inadmissible, and for practical purposes, non-existent,” Godoy said in a video broadcast on X, formerly Twitter.
“A judge, this judge, is violating articles of the Constitution and articles of the Amparo Law.”
In the two minute and 25 second video, the official argues that the constitutional article 39which establishes that sovereignty resides in the people.
“It is also violating article 135, which establishes the possibility of the Constitution being modified, added, by the reforming Power, which resides in the Congress of the Union: Chamber of Deputies, Chamber of Senators and the state Congresses. ”, he stated.
Ernestina Godoy assured that the reform of the Judiciary has scrupulously followed this entire process established in article 135 of the Constitution.
The Legal Counsel of the Presidency said that the judge is also violating article 61 of the Amparo Law.
“That establishes very clearly: the amparo trial that is inadmissible against, Section 1: the additions and reforms to the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States,” he stated.
“So reform must continue. All the stages that the reform itself foresees must be carried out until you and all of us can finally vote for judges, ministers, magistrates and the Judiciary can truly serve society.”
Watch the video here:
I want to share with you why an injunction against a constitutional reform is inadmissible, using as an example the case of the judge who ordered the reform of the Judiciary to be eliminated from the Official Gazette of the Federation (DOF). pic.twitter.com/tpCpcv9EuS
— Ernestina Godoy Ramos (@ErnestinaGodoy_) October 20, 2024
IOGE
